diff options
| author | David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net> | 2021-02-21 06:18:10 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net> | 2021-03-17 06:18:17 +0100 |
| commit | bf8d3d6aca3f20255a621ed1c148fd05b3a8ae5c (patch) | |
| tree | cd62a7c64fe8eb9f3252e1b608f1fb939c2a772c /zebra/zebra_vrf.c | |
| parent | 15c05f1edf079bc03b277e44426a8af8616bb10b (diff) | |
*: require semicolon after DEFINE_MTYPE & co
Back when I put this together in 2015, ISO C11 was still reasonably new
and we couldn't require it just yet. Without ISO C11, there is no
"good" way (only bad hacks) to require a semicolon after a macro that
ends with a function definition. And if you added one anyway, you'd get
"spurious semicolon" warnings on some compilers...
With C11, `_Static_assert()` at the end of a macro will make it so that
the semicolon is properly required, consumed, and not warned about.
Consistently requiring semicolons after "file-level" macros matches
Linux kernel coding style and helps some editors against mis-syntax'ing
these macros.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'zebra/zebra_vrf.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | zebra/zebra_vrf.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/zebra/zebra_vrf.c b/zebra/zebra_vrf.c index be4fb29aae..46398f3fb6 100644 --- a/zebra/zebra_vrf.c +++ b/zebra/zebra_vrf.c @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ static void zebra_vrf_table_create(struct zebra_vrf *zvrf, afi_t afi, static void zebra_rnhtable_node_cleanup(struct route_table *table, struct route_node *node); -DEFINE_MTYPE_STATIC(ZEBRA, ZEBRA_VRF, "ZEBRA VRF") -DEFINE_MTYPE_STATIC(ZEBRA, OTHER_TABLE, "Other Table") +DEFINE_MTYPE_STATIC(ZEBRA, ZEBRA_VRF, "ZEBRA VRF"); +DEFINE_MTYPE_STATIC(ZEBRA, OTHER_TABLE, "Other Table"); /* VRF information update. */ static void zebra_vrf_add_update(struct zebra_vrf *zvrf) |