diff options
| author | Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org> | 2019-01-02 18:37:00 -0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org> | 2019-01-14 15:58:26 -0200 |
| commit | 7fcb24bbaa91762965ad15aff10956919fdc3c08 (patch) | |
| tree | fbb7cb5cc14385c0586788f162d1dd61309d7e6b /zebra/zebra_errors.c | |
| parent | e4081c0e0b0ff763f446d92095017e8cb4df67aa (diff) | |
zebra: reject routes without nexthops
Routes without nexthops don't make any sense, so we need to reject
them otherwise weird things can happen.
NOTE: blackhole routes aren't nexthop-less, they do have a single
nexthop of type NEXTHOP_TYPE_BLACKHOLE.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'zebra/zebra_errors.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | zebra/zebra_errors.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zebra/zebra_errors.c b/zebra/zebra_errors.c index d7c17829cd..cb5f30df1f 100644 --- a/zebra/zebra_errors.c +++ b/zebra/zebra_errors.c @@ -505,6 +505,15 @@ static struct log_ref ferr_zebra_err[] = { "Check configuration values for correctness. If they are correct, report this as a bug.", }, { + .code = EC_ZEBRA_RX_ROUTE_NO_NEXTHOPS, + .title = + "Zebra received an installation request for a route without nexthops", + .description = + "Zebra received a message from a client requesting a route installation, but the route is invalid since it doesn't have any nexthop address or interface.", + .suggestion = + "This is a bug; please report it.", + }, + { .code = EC_ZEBRA_RX_SRCDEST_WRONG_AFI, .title = "Zebra received sourcedest route install without IPv6 address family", |