diff options
| author | Mark Stapp <mjs@voltanet.io> | 2021-04-09 14:24:22 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2021-04-09 14:24:22 -0400 |
| commit | 2fe49c7b3562bce6205ec8609ad9e38c95ae74a4 (patch) | |
| tree | 7151980ac5d00c52e567130d7523811c75cab44b /tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_routemaps.py | |
| parent | 895e674b5cb23b666fc6a8d6dedc2dc0d933ad15 (diff) | |
| parent | 0b25370e95306a6b1631fea8d521aa6f04e75fe4 (diff) | |
Merge pull request #8429 from donaldsharp/markit
Markit
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_routemaps.py')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_routemaps.py | 98 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 42 deletions
diff --git a/tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_routemaps.py b/tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_routemaps.py index b99ce6cfb8..7864d0307a 100644 --- a/tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_routemaps.py +++ b/tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_routemaps.py @@ -332,18 +332,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request): } } result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) result = verify_rib( tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False ) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: routes are present in fib \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are present in fib \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) step("Delete and reconfigure prefix list.") # Create ip prefix list @@ -383,18 +385,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request): } } result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) result = verify_rib( tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False ) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) pfx_list = { "r0": { @@ -438,18 +442,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request): } } result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) result = verify_rib( tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False ) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) write_test_footer(tc_name) @@ -496,18 +502,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request): dut = "r1" protocol = "ospf" result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, attempts=2, expected=False) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) result = verify_rib( tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, attempts=2, expected=False ) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) step( "configure the route map with the same name that is used " @@ -523,18 +531,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request): dut = "r1" protocol = "ospf" result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) result = verify_rib( tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False ) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) # Create route map routemaps = {"r0": {"route_maps": {"rmap_ipv4": [{"action": "deny"}]}}} @@ -545,18 +555,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request): dut = "r1" protocol = "ospf" result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) result = verify_rib( tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False ) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) step("Delete the route map.") # Create route map @@ -573,18 +585,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request): dut = "r1" protocol = "ospf" result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) result = verify_rib( tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False ) - assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n " - "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format( + assert ( + result is not True + ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format( tc_name, result - )) + ) write_test_footer(tc_name) |
