summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/nexthop.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDonald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>2024-04-19 12:13:32 -0400
committerDonald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>2024-04-22 10:44:55 -0400
commit29c1ff446e581fc403d155fd1d00b7c944cba56a (patch)
treea02d61ed9cee361aaaab6ee59937a6581bb1ffe1 /lib/nexthop.c
parent7f7bcb1ffa636318659abb16c7690d9875577ef9 (diff)
lib, zebra: Check for not being a blackhole route
In zebra_interface_nhg_reinstall zebra is checking that the nhg is a singleton and not a blackhole nhg. This was originally done with checking that the nexthop is a NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFINDEX, NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4_IFINDEX and NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV6_IFINDEX. This was excluding NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4 and NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV6. These were both possible to be received and maintained from the upper level protocol for when a route is being recursively resolved. If we have gotten to this point in zebra_interface_nhg_reinstall the nexthop group has already been installed at least once and we *know* that it is actually a valid nexthop. What the test is really trying to do is ensure that we are not reinstalling a blackhole nexthop group( Which is not possible to even be here by the way, but safety first! ). So let's change to test for that instead. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/nexthop.c')
-rw-r--r--lib/nexthop.c8
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/lib/nexthop.c b/lib/nexthop.c
index 4ddb53cd96..243b52d554 100644
--- a/lib/nexthop.c
+++ b/lib/nexthop.c
@@ -1150,11 +1150,7 @@ static ssize_t printfrr_nh(struct fbuf *buf, struct printfrr_eargs *ea,
return -1;
}
-bool nexthop_is_ifindex_type(const struct nexthop *nh)
+bool nexthop_is_blackhole(const struct nexthop *nh)
{
- if (nh->type == NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFINDEX ||
- nh->type == NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4_IFINDEX ||
- nh->type == NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV6_IFINDEX)
- return true;
- return false;
+ return nh->type == NEXTHOP_TYPE_BLACKHOLE;
}