| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
PBR needs the ability to allow ephermeal interfaces( bonds,
vrfs, dummy, bridges, etc ) to be destroyed and then
recreated and at the same time keep track of them and
rebuild state as appropriate when we get a change.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
Currently when a vrf is deleted than added back in PBR was
not going through and touching up all the data structures
that needed to be massaged to allow it to start working again.
This includes:
a) Search through the nexthop groups to find any nexthop
that references the old nexthop id and set it right again.
b) Search through the nexthop cache for nht and reset
those nexthops to the right vrf as well as re-register
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
DSCP / ECN-based PBR Matching
|
|
Matching by dscp may now also be specified by its standard codepoint
(provided it has one), such as `cf0` or `af11`.
Signed-off-by: Wesley Coakley <wcoakley@nvidia.com>
|
|
Extend PBR maps to discriminate by Differentiated Services Code Point and / or
Explicit Congestion Notification fields. These fields are used in the IP header
for classifying network traffic.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| DS FIELD, DSCP | ECN FIELD |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
DSCP: differentiated services codepoint
ECN: Explicit Congestion Notification
Signed-off-by: Wesley Coakley <wcoakley@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saurav Kumar Paul <saurav@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
Cleanup the marking of a nhc as installed/removed based on table
route installation.
We were not even handling the removal state at all.
We saw some timing issues with the routes being installed/removed
multiple times and then never resending the pbr map due to bad states
on the nhgc.
Dont worry about checking if its already marked installed before
scheduling the policy walk. We have a check in `pbr_send_map()`
to ensure we dont try to resend a map sequence already installed.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
Implement the ability to replace any existing `set *` or
`match` with another one or adding more config without having
to first delete the original config already there.
Before, we needed to constantly execute a `no` command for everything
to remove the rule before making changes to it. With this
patch, you can replace configs on individual sequences much
easier.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
`set vrf NAME` allows the pbr map to point to an arbitrary vrf table.
`set vrf unchanged` will use the interface's vrf for table lookup.
Further, add functionality for pbr to respond to interface events
such as interface vrf changes & interface creation/deletion.
Ex)
ubuntu_nh# show pbr map
pbr-map TEST valid: 1
Seq: 1 rule: 300 Installed: 3(1) Reason: Valid
SRC Match: 3.3.3.3/32
VRF Unchanged (use interface vrf)
pbr-map TEST2 valid: 1
Seq: 2 rule: 301 Installed: 3(2) Reason: Valid
SRC Match: 4.4.4.4/32
VRF Lookup: vrf-red
root@ubuntu_nh:/home# ip rule show
0: from all lookup local
300: from 3.3.3.3 iif dummy2 lookup main
300: from 3.3.3.3 iif dummyVRF lookup 1111
301: from 4.4.4.4 iif dummy1 lookup 1111
301: from 4.4.4.4 iif dummy3 lookup 1111
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@cumulusnetworks.com-
|
|
Adds support to specify marks in pbr-map match clause.
Marks should be provided as decimal (unsigned int).
Currently supported on Linux only. Attempting to configure
marks on other platform will result in:
"pbr marks are not supported on this platform"
Signed-off-by: Marcin Matlag <marcin.matlag@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
|
|
When we have a pbr-policy applied to an interface and the
rule is installed and then deleted, we would not properly
clean up the bit field for the pmi as well as not note
the rule as properly deleted.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
The pbrm->installed variable was being used only in a couple
of places and it has no real bearing on whether or not
we should install a rule or not. Remove this value.
Ticket: CM-20429
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
Somewhere along the way the ability to install multiple
pbr-policys for the same pbr-map was lost.
Add this back. There is a limitation in that we are limited
to 64 interfaces per pbr-policy.
Ticket: CM-20429
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
When the last match criteria was removed (dst-ip or src-ip), we were
not deleting the rule correctly for ipv6. This fix retains the
needed src-ip/dst-ip during the pbr_send_pbr_map process so the
appropriate information is available for the rule delete.
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
The pbr_events.c file was a mistake in that it overly complicated
the code and made it hard to think about what was happening.
Remove all the events and just do the work where needed.
Additionally rethink the sending of the pbr map to
zebra and only send one notification at a time instead
of having the sending function attempt to figure out
what to do.
Clean up some of the no form of commands to make them
work properly.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
This is an implementation of PBR for FRR.
This implemenation uses a combination of rules and
tables to determine how packets will flow.
PBR introduces a new concept of 'nexthop-groups' to
specify a group of nexthops that will be used for
ecmp. Nexthop-groups are specified on the cli via:
nexthop-group DONNA
nexthop 192.168.208.1
nexthop 192.168.209.1
nexthop 192.168.210.1
!
PBR sees the nexthop-group and installs these as a default
route with these nexthops starting at table 10000
robot# show pbr nexthop-groups
Nexthop-Group: DONNA Table: 10001 Valid: 1 Installed: 1
Valid: 1 nexthop 192.168.209.1
Valid: 1 nexthop 192.168.210.1
Valid: 1 nexthop 192.168.208.1
I have also introduced the ability to specify a table
in a 'show ip route table XXX' to see the specified tables.
robot# show ip route table 10001
Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP,
O - OSPF, I - IS-IS, B - BGP, P - PIM, E - EIGRP, N - NHRP,
T - Table, v - VNC, V - VNC-Direct, A - Babel, D - SHARP,
F - PBR,
> - selected route, * - FIB route
F>* 0.0.0.0/0 [0/0] via 192.168.208.1, enp0s8, 00:14:25
* via 192.168.209.1, enp0s9, 00:14:25
* via 192.168.210.1, enp0s10, 00:14:25
PBR tracks PBR-MAPS via the pbr-map command:
!
pbr-map EVA seq 10
match src-ip 4.3.4.0/24
set nexthop-group DONNA
!
pbr-map EVA seq 20
match dst-ip 4.3.5.0/24
set nexthop-group DONNA
!
pbr-maps can have 'match src-ip <prefix>' and 'match dst-ip <prefix>'
to affect decisions about incoming packets. Additionally if you
only have one nexthop to use for a pbr-map you do not need
to setup a nexthop-group and can specify 'set nexthop XXXX'.
To apply the pbr-map to an incoming interface you do this:
interface enp0s10
pbr-policy EVA
!
When a pbr-map is applied to interfaces it can be installed
into the kernel as a rule:
[sharpd@robot frr1]$ ip rule show
0: from all lookup local
309: from 4.3.4.0/24 iif enp0s10 lookup 10001
319: from all to 4.3.5.0/24 iif enp0s10 lookup 10001
1000: from all lookup [l3mdev-table]
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
[sharpd@robot frr1]$ ip route show table 10001
default proto pbr metric 20
nexthop via 192.168.208.1 dev enp0s8 weight 1
nexthop via 192.168.209.1 dev enp0s9 weight 1
nexthop via 192.168.210.1 dev enp0s10 weight 1
The linux kernel now will use the rules and tables to properly
apply these policies.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
