| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Done with a combination of regex'ing and banging my head against a wall.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
|
|
To ensure this, add a const modifier to functions' arguments. Would be
great do this initially and avoid this large code change, but better
late than never.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
|
|
There is a possibility that the same line can be matched as a command in
some node and its parent node. In this case, when reading the config,
this line is always executed as a command of the child node.
For example, with the following config:
```
router ospf
network 193.168.0.0/16 area 0
!
mpls ldp
discovery hello interval 111
!
```
Line `mpls ldp` is processed as command `mpls ldp-sync` inside the
`router ospf` node. This leads to a complete loss of `mpls ldp` node
configuration.
To eliminate this issue and all possible similar issues, let's print an
explicit "exit" at the end of every node config.
This commit also changes indentation for a couple of existing exit
commands so that all existing commands are on the same level as their
corresponding node-entering commands.
Fixes #9206.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
|
|
- Explicit segment list nai will be resolved to corresponded sid.
- Dynamic segment list (from pce) will be validated.
- If segment list could not be resolved or validated won't be used.
- Now this new config is supported
segment-list sl-1
index 10 nai prefix 10.1.2.1/32 iface 1
index 30 nai adjacency 10.2.5.2 10.2.5.5
index 40 nai prefix 10.10.10.5/32 algorithm 0
Signed-off-by: Javier Garcia <javier.garcia@voltanet.io>
|
|
This new daemon manages Segment-Routing Traffic-Engineering
(SR-TE) Policies and installs them into zebra. It provides
the usual yang support and vtysh commands to define or change
SR-TE Policies.
In a nutshell SR-TE Policies provide the possibility to steer
traffic through a (possibly dynamic) list of Segment Routing
segments to the endpoint of the policy. This list of segments
is part of a Candidate Path which again belongs to the SR-TE
Policy. SR-TE Policies are uniquely identified by their color
and endpoint. The color can be used to e.g. match BGP
communities on incoming traffic.
There can be multiple Candidate Paths for a single
policy, the active Candidate Path is chosen according to
certain conditions of which the most important is its
preference. Candidate Paths can be explicit (fixed list of
segments) or dynamic (list of segment comes from e.g. PCEP, see
below).
Configuration example:
segment-routing
traffic-eng
segment-list SL
index 10 mpls label 1111
index 20 mpls label 2222
!
policy color 4 endpoint 10.10.10.4
name POL4
binding-sid 104
candidate-path preference 100 name exp explicit segment-list SL
candidate-path preference 200 name dyn dynamic
!
!
!
There is an important connection between dynamic Candidate
Paths and the overall topic of Path Computation. Later on for
pathd a dynamic module will be introduced that is capable
of communicating via the PCEP protocol with a PCE (Path
Computation Element) which again is capable of calculating
paths according to its local TED (Traffic Engineering Database).
This dynamic module will be able to inject the mentioned
dynamic Candidate Paths into pathd based on calculated paths
from a PCE.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-06
Co-authored-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Co-authored-by: GalaxyGorilla <sascha@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Emanuele Di Pascale <emanuele@voltanet.io>
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
|
