| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Clean up a typo in a log message.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@cisco.com>
|
|
Create a single registry of default port values that daemons
are using. Most of these are vty ports, but there are some
others for features like ospfapi and zebra FPM.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@labn.net>
|
|
clang-format doesn't understand FRR_DAEMON_INFO is a long macro where
laying out items semantically makes sense.
(Also use only one `FRR_DAEMON_INFO(` in isisd so editors don't get
confused with the mismatching `( ( )`.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
|
|
We should probably prevent any type of namespace collision
with something else.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
|
|
Let's find a better name for it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
|
|
Convert the `struct thread_master` to `struct event_master`
across the code base.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
|
|
This is a first in a series of commits, whose goal is to rename
the thread system in FRR to an event system. There is a continual
problem where people are confusing `struct thread` with a true
pthread. In reality, our entire thread.c is an event system.
In this commit rename the thread.[ch] files to event.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
|
|
Done with a combination of regex'ing and banging my head against a wall.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
|
|
Naming functions/data structures more appropriately for
the project we are actually in.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
|
|
- pathd will act as a client to for the configured igp.
- pathd must be configured to activate and receive data from igp.
!pathd config snippet
segment-routing
traffic-eng
mpls-te on
mpls-te import ospfv2
Signed-off-by: Javier Garcia <javier.garcia@voltanet.io>
|
|
... again ...
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
|
|
This new daemon manages Segment-Routing Traffic-Engineering
(SR-TE) Policies and installs them into zebra. It provides
the usual yang support and vtysh commands to define or change
SR-TE Policies.
In a nutshell SR-TE Policies provide the possibility to steer
traffic through a (possibly dynamic) list of Segment Routing
segments to the endpoint of the policy. This list of segments
is part of a Candidate Path which again belongs to the SR-TE
Policy. SR-TE Policies are uniquely identified by their color
and endpoint. The color can be used to e.g. match BGP
communities on incoming traffic.
There can be multiple Candidate Paths for a single
policy, the active Candidate Path is chosen according to
certain conditions of which the most important is its
preference. Candidate Paths can be explicit (fixed list of
segments) or dynamic (list of segment comes from e.g. PCEP, see
below).
Configuration example:
segment-routing
traffic-eng
segment-list SL
index 10 mpls label 1111
index 20 mpls label 2222
!
policy color 4 endpoint 10.10.10.4
name POL4
binding-sid 104
candidate-path preference 100 name exp explicit segment-list SL
candidate-path preference 200 name dyn dynamic
!
!
!
There is an important connection between dynamic Candidate
Paths and the overall topic of Path Computation. Later on for
pathd a dynamic module will be introduced that is capable
of communicating via the PCEP protocol with a PCE (Path
Computation Element) which again is capable of calculating
paths according to its local TED (Traffic Engineering Database).
This dynamic module will be able to inject the mentioned
dynamic Candidate Paths into pathd based on calculated paths
from a PCE.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-06
Co-authored-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Co-authored-by: GalaxyGorilla <sascha@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Emanuele Di Pascale <emanuele@voltanet.io>
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
|
