From fa8da98c263029568e9842a457be542062801b07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Donald Sharp Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 14:34:14 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] pimd: Fix up rp initialization breakage When I converted over to using 'struct prefix' I broke the initialization of the rp. In addition, I used the wrong AFI type to switch on in pim_rpf.c Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp --- pimd/pim_rp.c | 5 +++-- pimd/pim_rpf.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/pimd/pim_rp.c b/pimd/pim_rp.c index 05b6623e8c..612c08e1b7 100644 --- a/pimd/pim_rp.c +++ b/pimd/pim_rp.c @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ pim_rp_init (void) return; str2prefix ("224.0.0.0/4", &rp_info->group); + rp_info->group.family = AF_INET; rp_info->rp.rpf_addr.family = AF_INET; rp_info->rp.rpf_addr.u.prefix4.s_addr = INADDR_NONE; tail = rp_info; @@ -192,8 +193,8 @@ pim_rp_new (const char *rp, const char *group_range) if (!result) return -1; - - result = inet_pton (rp_info->rp.rpf_addr.family, rp, &rp_info->rp.rpf_addr.u.prefix); + rp_info->rp.rpf_addr.family = AF_INET; + result = inet_pton (rp_info->rp.rpf_addr.family, rp, &rp_info->rp.rpf_addr.u.prefix4); if (result <= 0) return -1; diff --git a/pimd/pim_rpf.c b/pimd/pim_rpf.c index 662d4aaf52..f3bdb68305 100644 --- a/pimd/pim_rpf.c +++ b/pimd/pim_rpf.c @@ -245,10 +245,10 @@ pim_rpf_addr_is_inaddr_none (struct pim_rpf *rpf) { switch (rpf->rpf_addr.family) { - case AFI_IP: + case AF_INET: return rpf->rpf_addr.u.prefix4.s_addr == INADDR_NONE; break; - case AFI_IP6: + case AF_INET6: zlog_warn ("%s: v6 Unimplmeneted", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); return 1; break; @@ -265,10 +265,10 @@ pim_rpf_addr_is_inaddr_any (struct pim_rpf *rpf) { switch (rpf->rpf_addr.family) { - case AFI_IP: + case AF_INET: return rpf->rpf_addr.u.prefix4.s_addr == INADDR_ANY; break; - case AFI_IP6: + case AF_INET6: zlog_warn ("%s: v6 Unimplmented", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); return 1; break; -- 2.39.5