From 9eda95bde57355387f64065967bbd6e01cced05f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Donald Sharp Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 20:36:10 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] pimd: Fix some static analysis Using && instead of &. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp --- pimd/pim_register.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pimd/pim_register.c b/pimd/pim_register.c index 11717acf0c..406f91494a 100644 --- a/pimd/pim_register.c +++ b/pimd/pim_register.c @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ pim_register_recv (struct interface *ifp, if (I_am_RP (group) && (dest_addr.s_addr == ((RP (group))->rpf_addr.s_addr))) { sentRegisterStop = 0; - if (*bits && PIM_REGISTER_BORDER_BIT) { + if (*bits & PIM_REGISTER_BORDER_BIT) { struct in_addr pimbr = pim_br_get_pmbr (source, group); if (PIM_DEBUG_PIM_PACKETS) zlog_debug("%s: Received Register message with Border bit set", __func__); @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ pim_register_recv (struct interface *ifp, } if (!(upstream->sptbit == PIM_UPSTREAM_SPTBIT_TRUE) && - !(*bits && PIM_REGISTER_NR_BIT)) { + !(*bits & PIM_REGISTER_NR_BIT)) { //decapsulate and forward the iner packet to //inherited_olist(S,G,rpt) } -- 2.39.5