Kaushik [Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:29:51 +0000 (04:29 -0700)]
ospf6d: Support for nssa in ospfv3
The following is implemented.
1. Configuring area as NSSA.
2. Generating Type 7 LSA.
3. Conversion of Type 7 to Type 5 ( Default Behavior).
4. NSSA ABR selection.
Christian Hopps [Fri, 28 May 2021 19:16:18 +0000 (19:16 +0000)]
northbound: KISS always batch yang config (file read), it's faster
The backoff code assumed that yang operations always completed quickly.
It checked for > 100 YANG modeled commands happening in under 1 second
to enable batching. If 100 yang modeled commands always take longer than
1 second batching is never enabled. This is the exact opposite of what
we want to happen since batching speeds the operations up.
Here are the results for libyang2 code without and with batching.
(IPv6 numbers are basically the same as iPv4, a couple percent slower)
Clearly we need this. Please note the growth (1K to 2K) w/o batching is
non-linear and 100 times slower than batched.
Notes on code: The use of the new `nb_cli_apply_changes_clear_pending`
is to commit any pending changes (including the current one). This is
done when the code would not correctly handle a single diff that
included the current changes with possible following changes. For
example, a "no" command followed by a new value to replace it would be
merged into a change, and the code would not deal well with that. A good
example of this is BGP neighbor peer-group changing. The other use is
after entering a router level (e.g., "router bgp") where the follow-on
command handlers expect that router object to now exists. The code
eventually needs to be cleaned up to not fail in these cases, but that
is for future NB cleanup.
the config for dynamic candidate paths with bandwidth preferences
was using a different order of keywords (required bandwidth X) than
the corresponding command (bandwidth X required). This confuses
frr-reload, and possibly users too. Make both use the same order.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Di Pascale <emanuele@voltanet.io>
Igor Ryzhov [Thu, 6 May 2021 23:49:40 +0000 (02:49 +0300)]
lib: fix binding to a vrf
There are two possible use-cases for the `vrf_bind` function:
- bind socket to an interface in a vrf
- bind socket to a vrf device
For the former case, there's one problem - success is returned when the
interface is not found. In that case, the socket is left unbound without
throwing an error.
For the latter case, there are multiple possible problems:
- If the name is not set, then the socket is left unbound (zebra, vrrp).
- If the name is "default" and there's an interface with that name in the
default VRF, then the socket is bound to that interface.
- In most daemons, if the router is configured before the VRF is actually
created, we're trying to open and bind the socket right after the
daemon receives a VRF registration from zebra. We may not receive the
VRF-interface registration from zebra yet at that point. Therefore,
`if_lookup_by_name` fails, and the socket is left unbound.
This commit fixes all the issues and updates the function description.
Suggested-by: Pat Ruddy <pat@voltanet.io> Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Pat Ruddy [Tue, 25 May 2021 08:38:26 +0000 (09:38 +0100)]
ospf6: fix memory leak in ospf6_abr_examin_summary
Ensure that if allocated route is not added to a table then it is
deleted to avoid leaking memory.
Add a new memory type for route table so that ospf6 routes can be
distinguished in the show memory output in isolation.
Louis Scalbert [Wed, 12 May 2021 15:17:56 +0000 (17:17 +0200)]
bgpd: add show bgp summary filter by neighbor or AS
Add ability to filter session on show bgp summary by neighbor or
remote AS:
ubuntu# show bgp summary ?
neighbor Show only the specified neighbor session
remote-as Show only the specified remote AS session
ubuntu# show bgp summary neighbor ?
A.B.C.D Neighbor to display information about
WORD Neighbor on BGP configured interface
X:X::X:X Neighbor to display information about
ubuntu# show bgp summary remote-as ?
(1-4294967295) AS number
external External (eBGP) AS sessions
internal Internal (iBGP) AS sessions
This patch includes the documentation and the topotest.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Martin Buck [Wed, 26 May 2021 14:03:51 +0000 (16:03 +0200)]
ospf6d: Fix route map "set tag" command
So far, "set tag" was 99% implemented in ospf6d, but registration of the
hook functions was missing, causing "set tag" actions in route maps to be
ignored in ospf6d.
This commit adds the missing hook registration.
Signed-off-by: Martin Buck <mb-tmp-tvguho.pbz@gromit.dyndns.org>
Igor Ryzhov [Wed, 26 May 2021 08:48:09 +0000 (11:48 +0300)]
ospf6d: fix debug message config write
Fix the following issues:
- if "send" is combined with "recv-hdr", only "send" is shown
- if "recv" is combined with "send-hdr", only "recv" is shown
- if both "send-hdr" and "recv-hdr" are enabled, "; header only" is shown
Igor Ryzhov [Tue, 25 May 2021 18:58:55 +0000 (21:58 +0300)]
ospf6d: fix possible crashes
OSPF6 instance may not exist when processing interface state change.
Do not execute processing steps that require an instance if an area is
not configured for an interface.
Donald Sharp [Mon, 24 May 2021 17:45:29 +0000 (13:45 -0400)]
ospfd: Fix quick interface down up event handling in ospf
When we get this sequence of events:
- zebra receives interface up, sends to ospf
- ospf receives intf up, processes( including neighbor formation and spf )
and sends route to zebra for installation.
- zebra receives route for processing, schedules it too happen in the future
- zebra receives interface down event, sends to ospf
- zebra processes route X and marks it inactive because nexthop
interface is down
- zebra receives interface up event, sends to ospf
- ospf receives both events and processes the change and decides
that nothing has changed so it does not send any route change for X to zebra.
At this point zebra has a route from ospf that is marked as inactive, while
ospf believes that the route should be installed properly.
Modify the code such that on an interface down event, ospf marks the routes
as changed if the ifindex is being used for a nexthop, so that when ospf
is deciding if routes have changed post spf that it can just automatically
send that route down again if it still exists.
Chirag Shah [Sun, 16 May 2021 02:41:43 +0000 (19:41 -0700)]
tools: fix peer-group deletion in frr-reload
All of peers and respective configs are wiped out when
pee-group is removed.
In an attempt to remove peer-group and its associated peers
configs via frr-reload fails if the peer-group is removed first.
To pass the peer-group config removal via frr-reload following
steps are taken:
Find the bgp context to which peer-group belongs.
Find the peer-group associated peer(s) and store them in a list.
Remove the peers config lines from the pending list.
Move the peer-group deletion line to end of the pending list so
any remaining peer-group associated config can be removed successfully.
The above steps take 3 iterations over the pending list and scales
linearly.
Rafael Zalamena [Mon, 24 May 2021 11:30:26 +0000 (08:30 -0300)]
ospf6d: fix address sanitizer crash
Don't `memcpy` a `struct prefix` the memory size varies depending on the
original intended type. In this case the original type was (casted away)
`struct prefix_ipv6` and we tried to copy `struct prefix` which is
bigger.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Christian Hopps [Sun, 23 May 2021 20:26:49 +0000 (20:26 +0000)]
bgpd: fix default for extended-nexthop-capability
The default for extended-nexthop-capability is true for
unnumbered (interface) neighbors, false for other types. Break the inner
grouping out of the outer neighbor-parameters grouping so that we can
refine the default in that uses case.
Trey Aspelund [Fri, 21 May 2021 22:04:15 +0000 (22:04 +0000)]
lib: fix handling of rmap prefix-tree default node
Prior to this commit, updating a prefix-list that is referenced by a
route-map clause will unconditionally delete the root node of that
route-map's prefix-tree (used with route-map optimization).
This is problematic because routes not matching a more specific node
in the tree (i.e. other prefix-list sequences) will not fall-back to
the default node, thus they will not hit any route-map sequences.
This commit ensures that an update to a prefix-list will only delete
the default node while adding the first/only seq to the list.
Example config:
========
ip prefix-list peer475-out-pfxlist seq 45 permit 2.138.0.0/16
ip prefix-list peer475-out-pfxlist seq 50 permit 0.0.0.0/0
!
route-map peer475-out permit 5
match ip address prefix-list peer475-out-pfxlist
Before:
========
ub20# do show route-map peer475-out prefix-table
ZEBRA:
IPv4 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
0.0.0.0/0 (2)
(P)
peer475-out seq 5
2.138.0.0/16 (2)
(P) 0.0.0.0/0
peer475-out seq 5
IPv6 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
BGP:
IPv4 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
0.0.0.0/0 (2)
(P)
peer475-out seq 5
2.138.0.0/16 (2)
(P) 0.0.0.0/0
peer475-out seq 5
IPv6 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
ub20# conf t
ub20(config)# ip prefix-list peer475-out-pfxlist seq 45 permit 2.138.0.0/16 le 32
ub20(config)# do show route-map peer475-out prefix-table
ZEBRA:
IPv4 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
2.138.0.0/16 (2)
(P)
peer475-out seq 5
IPv6 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
BGP:
IPv4 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
2.138.0.0/16 (2)
(P)
peer475-out seq 5
IPv6 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
ub20(config)#
After:
========
ub20(config)# do show route-map peer475-out prefix-table
ZEBRA:
IPv4 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
0.0.0.0/0 (2)
(P)
peer475-out seq 5
2.138.0.0/16 (2)
(P) 0.0.0.0/0
peer475-out seq 5
IPv6 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
BGP:
IPv4 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
0.0.0.0/0 (2)
(P)
peer475-out seq 5
2.138.0.0/16 (2)
(P) 0.0.0.0/0
peer475-out seq 5
IPv6 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
ub20(config)# ip prefix-list peer475-out-pfxlist seq 45 permit 2.138.0.0/16 le 32
ub20(config)# do show route-map peer475-out prefix-table
ZEBRA:
IPv4 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
0.0.0.0/0 (2)
(P)
peer475-out seq 5
2.138.0.0/16 (2)
(P) 0.0.0.0/0
peer475-out seq 5
IPv6 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
BGP:
IPv4 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
0.0.0.0/0 (2)
(P)
peer475-out seq 5
2.138.0.0/16 (2)
(P) 0.0.0.0/0
peer475-out seq 5
IPv6 Prefix Route-map Index List
_______________ ____________________
Don Slice [Wed, 19 May 2021 18:23:28 +0000 (14:23 -0400)]
ospfd: "ip ospf area" command can select wrong process
Found that in some circumstances, when the "ip ospf area"
command was entered for the default vrf, the wrong ospf
process would be used to check for the presence of a
"network" statement, causing the "ip ospf area" command to
be rejected. This was due to the command using the ospf
instance lookup to find the right ospf process, which can
be in error depending on when the processes were created.
Christian Hopps [Thu, 20 May 2021 06:49:32 +0000 (06:49 +0000)]
lib: fix northbound merge code (libyang)
lyd_merge_tree replaces dest siblings with source siblings, not what we
want. Instead lyd_merge_siblings to keep both. Instead lyd_merge_siblings
to keep both.
projects / mirror / frr.git / log