Mark Stapp [Wed, 3 Feb 2021 21:28:18 +0000 (16:28 -0500)]
tests: fix ospf6_topo1 missing ref files
Only one of the four reference files was present; add the missing
three. The test just silently passed if a ref file was missing:
change that to a failure.
David Lamparter [Tue, 2 Feb 2021 20:05:50 +0000 (21:05 +0100)]
lib/xref: fix frrtrace() calls in thread code
This didn't exist yet when the xref code came around, and since
frrtrace() gets collapsed to nothing by the preprocessor when
tracepoints are disabled, it didn't cause any compiler errors...
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
David Lamparter [Tue, 2 Feb 2021 18:38:38 +0000 (19:38 +0100)]
lib/xref: work around GCC bug 41091
gcc fucks up global variables with section attributes when they're used
in templated C++ code. The template instantiation "magic" kinda breaks
down (it's implemented through COMDAT in the linker, which clashes with
the section attribute.)
The workaround provides full runtime functionality, but the xref
extraction tool (xrelfo.py) won't work on C++ code compiled by GCC.
FWIW, clang gets this right.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
bgpd: config connect timer is not applied immediately for peers in non-established state.
Description:
When user is config connect timer, it doesn't reflect
immediately. It reflect when next time neighbor is tried to reconnect.
Problem Description/Summary :
When user is config connect timer, it doesn't reflect
The network connection was aborted by the local system.d to reconnect.
Fix is to update the connect timer immediately if BGP
session is not in establish state.
Expected Behavior :
If neighbor is not yet established, we should immediately apply the config connect timer to the peer.
Stephen Worley [Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:20:22 +0000 (16:20 -0500)]
zebra: disallow resolution to duplicate nexthops
Disallow the resolution to nexthops that are marked duplicate.
When we are resolving to an ecmp group, it's possible this
group has duplicates.
I found this when I hit a bug where we can have groups resolving
to each other and cause the resolved->next->next pointer to increase
exponentially. Sufficiently large ecmp and zebra will grind to a hault.
Like so:
```
D> 4.4.4.14/32 [150/0] via 1.1.1.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
* via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.2 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.3 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.4 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.5 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.6 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.7 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.8 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.9 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.10 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.11 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.12 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.13 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.15 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.16 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
D> 4.4.4.15/32 [150/0] via 1.1.1.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
* via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.2 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.3 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.4 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.5 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.6 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.7 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.8 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.9 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.10 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.11 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.12 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.13 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.14 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.16 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
D> 4.4.4.16/32 [150/0] via 1.1.1.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:19
* via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:19
via 4.4.4.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:19
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:19
via 4.4.4.2 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:19
Then use sharpd to install 4.4.4.16 -> 4.4.4.1 pointing to that nexthop
group in decending order.
```
With these changes it prevents the growing ecmp above by disallowing
duplicates to be in the resolution decision. These nexthops are not
installed anyways so why should we be resolving to them?
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
David Lamparter [Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:50:01 +0000 (17:50 +0100)]
lib/printf: disable `%n` specifier
We don't use `%n` anywhere, so the only purpose it serves is enabling
exploits.
(I thought about this initially when adding printfrr, but I wasn't sure
we don't use `%n` anywhere, and thought I'll check later, and then just
forgot it...)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
David Lamparter [Thu, 30 Apr 2020 19:33:11 +0000 (21:33 +0200)]
lib/xref: put setup calls in libraries
Our "true" libraries (i.e. not modules) don't invoke neither
FRR_DAEMON_INFO nor FRR_MODULE_SETUP, hence XREF_SETUP isn't invoked
either. Invoke it directly to get things working.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
David Lamparter [Thu, 9 Aug 2018 20:50:19 +0000 (22:50 +0200)]
lib: "xref" identifier infrastructure
This adds the machinery for cross reference points (hence "xref") for
things to be annotated with source code location or other metadata
and/or to be uniquely identified and found at runtime or by dissecting
executable files.
The extraction tool to walk down an ELF file is done and working but
needs some more cleanup and will be added in a separate commit.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
Donald Sharp [Mon, 1 Feb 2021 15:14:38 +0000 (10:14 -0500)]
bgpd: Centralize the dest unlocking for adj_out data structure
When FRR creates a adj_out data structure we lock the `struct
bgp_dest` node associated with it. On freeing of this data
structure and removing the lock it was not associated with
the actual free of the adjacency structure. Let's clean up
the lock/unlock to be centralized to the alloc/free of the adj_out.
Donald Sharp [Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:25:51 +0000 (11:25 -0500)]
lib: Line up `show thread cpu` output appropriately
The output from `show thread cpu` was not lined up appropriately
for the header line. As well as the function name we were
calling in the output. Fix it.
Donald Sharp [Sun, 31 Jan 2021 13:56:00 +0000 (08:56 -0500)]
zebra: Prevent sending of unininted data
valgrind is reporting: 2448137-==2448137== Thread 5 zebra_apic: 2448137-==2448137== Syscall param writev(vector[...]) points to uninitialised byte(s) 2448137:==2448137== at 0x4D6FDDD: __writev (writev.c:26) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x4D6FDDD: writev (writev.c:24) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x48A35F5: buffer_flush_available (buffer.c:431) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x48A3504: buffer_flush_all (buffer.c:237) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x495948: zserv_write (zserv.c:263) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x4904B7E: thread_call (thread.c:1681) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x48BD3E5: fpt_run (frr_pthread.c:308) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x4C61EA6: start_thread (pthread_create.c:477) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x4D78DEE: clone (clone.S:95) 2448137-==2448137== Address 0x720c3ce is 62 bytes inside a block of size 4,120 alloc'd 2448137:==2448137== at 0x483877F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x48D2977: qmalloc (memory.c:110) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x48A30E3: buffer_add (buffer.c:135) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x48A30E3: buffer_put (buffer.c:161) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x49591B: zserv_write (zserv.c:256) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x4904B7E: thread_call (thread.c:1681) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x48BD3E5: fpt_run (frr_pthread.c:308) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x4C61EA6: start_thread (pthread_create.c:477) 2448137-==2448137== by 0x4D78DEE: clone (clone.S:95) 2448137-==2448137== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation 2448137:==2448137== at 0x43E490: zserv_encode_vrf (zapi_msg.c:103)
Effectively we are sending `struct vrf_data` without ensuring
data has been properly initialized.
Donald Sharp [Sun, 31 Jan 2021 13:52:44 +0000 (08:52 -0500)]
ospf6d: prevent use after free
Valgrind reports:
2437395-==2437395== Invalid read of size 8 2437395:==2437395== at 0x40B610: ospf6_asbr_update_route_ecmp_path (ospf6_asbr.c:327) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x40BC7C: ospf6_asbr_lsa_add (ospf6_asbr.c:544) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x40C5DF: ospf6_asbr_lsentry_add (ospf6_asbr.c:829) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x42D88D: ospf6_top_brouter_hook_add (ospf6_top.c:185) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x4188E3: ospf6_intra_brouter_calculation (ospf6_intra.c:2320) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x42C624: ospf6_spf_calculation_thread (ospf6_spf.c:638) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x4904B7E: thread_call (thread.c:1681) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x48CAA27: frr_run (libfrr.c:1126) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x40AF43: main (ospf6_main.c:232) 2437395-==2437395== Address 0x5c668a8 is 24 bytes inside a block of size 256 free'd 2437395:==2437395== at 0x48399AB: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:538) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x429027: ospf6_route_delete (ospf6_route.c:419) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x429027: ospf6_route_unlock (ospf6_route.c:460) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x429027: ospf6_route_remove (ospf6_route.c:887) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x40B343: ospf6_asbr_update_route_ecmp_path (ospf6_asbr.c:318) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x40BC7C: ospf6_asbr_lsa_add (ospf6_asbr.c:544) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x40C5DF: ospf6_asbr_lsentry_add (ospf6_asbr.c:829) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x42D88D: ospf6_top_brouter_hook_add (ospf6_top.c:185) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x4188E3: ospf6_intra_brouter_calculation (ospf6_intra.c:2320) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x42C624: ospf6_spf_calculation_thread (ospf6_spf.c:638) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x4904B7E: thread_call (thread.c:1681) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x48CAA27: frr_run (libfrr.c:1126) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x40AF43: main (ospf6_main.c:232) 2437395-==2437395== Block was alloc'd at 2437395:==2437395== at 0x483AB65: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:760) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x48D2A32: qcalloc (memory.c:115) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x427CE4: ospf6_route_create (ospf6_route.c:402) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x40BA8A: ospf6_asbr_lsa_add (ospf6_asbr.c:490) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x40C5DF: ospf6_asbr_lsentry_add (ospf6_asbr.c:829) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x42D88D: ospf6_top_brouter_hook_add (ospf6_top.c:185) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x4188E3: ospf6_intra_brouter_calculation (ospf6_intra.c:2320) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x42C624: ospf6_spf_calculation_thread (ospf6_spf.c:638) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x4904B7E: thread_call (thread.c:1681) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x48CAA27: frr_run (libfrr.c:1126) 2437395-==2437395== by 0x40AF43: main (ospf6_main.c:232)
ospfv3 loops through the ecmp routes to decide what to clean up. In some
situations the code free's up an existing route at the head of the list.
Cleaning the pointers in the list but never touching the original pointer.
In that case notice and update the old pointer.
Donatas Abraitis [Sun, 31 Jan 2021 14:20:36 +0000 (16:20 +0200)]
bgpd: Initialize bgp_notify.raw_data before passing to bgp_notify_receive()
``` 2523558-==2523558== 2523558-==2523558== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) 2523558:==2523558== at 0x47F242: bgp_notify_admin_message (bgp_debug.c:505) 2523558-==2523558== by 0x47F242: bgp_notify_print (bgp_debug.c:534) 2523558-==2523558== by 0x4BA9BC: bgp_notify_receive (bgp_packet.c:1905) 2523558-==2523558== by 0x4BA9BC: bgp_process_packet (bgp_packet.c:2602) 2523558-==2523558== by 0x4904B7E: thread_call (thread.c:1681) 2523558-==2523558== by 0x48CAA27: frr_run (libfrr.c:1126) 2523558-==2523558== by 0x474B1A: main (bgp_main.c:540) 2523558-==2523558== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation 2523558:==2523558== at 0x4BA33D: bgp_process_packet (bgp_packet.c:2529)
```
Donald Sharp [Sun, 31 Jan 2021 13:32:15 +0000 (08:32 -0500)]
eigrpd: Correctly set the mtu for eigrp packets sent
This version of eigrp pre-calculated the eigrp metric
to be a default of 1500 bytes, but unfortunately it
had entered the byte order wrong.
Modify the code to properly set the byte order
according to the eigrp rfc as well as actually
read in and transmit the mtu of the interface
instead of hard coding it to 1500 bytes.
Fixes: #7986 Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Donald Sharp [Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:31:47 +0000 (14:31 -0500)]
bfdd: Prevent unininited data transmittal
Valgrind reports:
2052866-==2052866== 2052866-==2052866== Syscall param sendmsg(msg.msg_name) points to uninitialised byte(s) 2052866:==2052866== at 0x49C8E13: sendmsg (sendmsg.c:28) 2052866-==2052866== by 0x11DC08: bp_udp_send (bfd_packet.c:823) 2052866-==2052866== by 0x11DD76: ptm_bfd_echo_snd (bfd_packet.c:179) 2052866-==2052866== by 0x114C2D: ptm_bfd_echo_xmt_TO (bfd.c:469) 2052866-==2052866== by 0x114C2D: ptm_bfd_echo_start (bfd.c:498) 2052866-==2052866== by 0x114C2D: bs_echo_timer_handler (bfd.c:1199) 2052866-==2052866== by 0x11E478: bfd_recv_cb (bfd_packet.c:702) 2052866-==2052866== by 0x4904846: thread_call (thread.c:1681) 2052866-==2052866== by 0x48CB4DF: frr_run (libfrr.c:1126) 2052866-==2052866== by 0x113044: main (bfdd.c:403) 2052866-==2052866== Address 0x1ffefff3e8 is on thread 1's stack
In ptm_bfd_echo_snd, for the v4 case we were memsetting the v6 memory
then setting the v4 memory. Just fix it.
Donald Sharp [Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:13:34 +0000 (14:13 -0500)]
ospfd: Prevent sending of uninited data to zebra
Valgrind reports: 2174600-==2174600== 2174600-==2174600== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s) 2174600:==2174600== at 0x49C7FB3: write (write.c:26) 2174600-==2174600== by 0x48A4EA0: buffer_write (buffer.c:475) 2174600-==2174600== by 0x4915AD9: zclient_send_message (zclient.c:298) 2174600-==2174600== by 0x12DB97: ospf_ldp_sync_state_req_msg (ospf_ldp_sync.c:114) 2174600-==2174600== by 0x12E4F0: ospf_ldp_sync_if_start (ospf_ldp_sync.c:160) 2174600-==2174600== by 0x12E4F0: ospf_ldp_sync_ism_change (ospf_ldp_sync.c:339) 2174600-==2174600== by 0x12E4F0: ospf_ldp_sync_ism_change (ospf_ldp_sync.c:332) 2174600-==2174600== by 0x12C6A2: hook_call_ospf_ism_change (ospf_ism.c:46) 2174600-==2174600== by 0x12C6A2: ism_change_state (ospf_ism.c:540) 2174600-==2174600== by 0x12C6A2: ospf_ism_event (ospf_ism.c:600) 2174600-==2174600== by 0x4904846: thread_call (thread.c:1681)
When we send the request structure we are sending the whole thing and the
interface name string has junk at the end. Not a big deal, but cleans
up valgrind going wumple on us.
Donald Sharp [Sat, 30 Jan 2021 18:38:32 +0000 (13:38 -0500)]
eigrpd: Prevent uninitialized value from being used
valgrind is finding:
2141982-==2141982== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) 2141982:==2141982== at 0x11A7A6: eigrp_metrics_is_same (eigrp_metric.c:134) 2141982-==2141982== by 0x120360: eigrp_topology_update_distance (eigrp_topology.c:374) 2141982-==2141982== by 0x124F01: eigrp_get_fsm_event (eigrp_fsm.c:284) 2141982-==2141982== by 0x12519E: eigrp_fsm_event (eigrp_fsm.c:419) 2141982-==2141982== by 0x1206A1: eigrp_topology_neighbor_down (eigrp_topology.c:518) 2141982-==2141982== by 0x11AB3A: eigrp_nbr_delete (eigrp_neighbor.c:178) 2141982-==2141982== by 0x124494: eigrp_finish_final (eigrpd.c:271) 2141982-==2141982== by 0x1245A8: eigrp_finish (eigrpd.c:247) 2141982-==2141982== by 0x124630: eigrp_terminate (eigrpd.c:240) 2141982-==2141982== by 0x11344B: sigint (eigrp_main.c:112) 2141982-==2141982== by 0x48F5F32: quagga_sigevent_process (sigevent.c:130)
Donald Sharp [Sat, 30 Jan 2021 02:27:49 +0000 (21:27 -0500)]
bgpd: Remove hidden `neighbor X route-map Y <in|out>` command
This command was put in place to allow upgrades for the
neighbor command from the BGP_NODE and have it put
into the ipv4 uni node instead. Since this
utterly kills the yang conversion. I believe we need
to remove this. Since people upgrading will just loose
the route-map applicatoin( if they are using such an old
config ) and RFC 8212 will come into play. They'll figure
it out pretty fast.
Fixes: #7983 Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The calling function of ospf_nbr_nbma_lookup_next calls
this function and then immediately returns when it
gets the NULL. Just cleanup a bit more code.
Donald Sharp [Thu, 28 Jan 2021 19:04:59 +0000 (14:04 -0500)]
pbrd: Remove #if 0 code
I am not even sure what the goal of this code was in any
way shape fashion or form. But since it's pbr_nht.c
I as the original author should know... But I don't.
Donald Sharp [Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:21:12 +0000 (13:21 -0500)]
ospfd: Remove #if 0 code
The #if 0 code in ospfd, has not been compiled since at least
2012. If we are at least 9 years old at this point with no effort
to use or save, we should just get rid of it.
saravanank [Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:33:41 +0000 (03:33 -0700)]
pimd: SGRpt prune received during prune didn't override holdtime
RCA: There were 2 problems.
1. SGRpt prune expiry didn't create S,G entry with none oil when no other
interfaces were part of the oil.
2. When restarting the timer with new hold value, comparision was missing and
old timer was not stopping.
Fix:
SGRpt Prune pending expiry will put SG entry with none oil if no other
Signed-off-by: Saravanan K <saravanank@vmware.com>
interfaces present. If present we will be deleting the inherited oif from oil.
Deleting the oif in that scenario will take care of changing mroute.
When alone interface expires in SGRpt prune pending state, we shall detect by
checking installed flag. if not installed, install mroute.
Pat Ruddy [Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:16:26 +0000 (14:16 +0000)]
bgpd: make sure nh is valid for MPLS vpn routes
If we are using a nexthop for a MPLS VPN route make sure the
nexthop is over a labeled path. This new check mirrors the one
in validate_paths (where routes are enabled when a nexthop
becomes reachable). The check is introduced to the code path
where routes are added and the nexthop is looked up.