staticd: fix late initialization of blackhole type
If a static route is added to a not-yet-existing VRF, the blackhole type
is not initialized. Initialization must be done before the VRF existence
check.
Rafael Zalamena [Thu, 8 Jul 2021 17:09:20 +0000 (14:09 -0300)]
lib,ospfd,ospf6d: remove duplicated function
Move `is_default_prefix` variations to `lib/prefix.h` and make the code
use the library version instead of implementing it again.
NOTE
----
The function was split into per family versions to cover all types.
Using `union prefixconstptr` is not possible due to static analyzer
warnings which cause CI to fail.
The specific cases that would cause this failure were:
- Caller used `struct prefix_ipv4` and called the generic function.
- `is_default_prefix` with signature using `const struct prefix *` or
`union prefixconstptr`.
The compiler would complain about reading bytes outside of the memory
bounds even though it did not take into account the `prefix->family`
part.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Christian Hopps [Fri, 9 Jul 2021 07:58:02 +0000 (03:58 -0400)]
ospf6d: fix backlink check
This code has been wrong ~ever (according to git history). There are 3
conditional blocks with the added assertion that both the LSA and the
vertex being checked can't both be network LSAs.
The third block is clearly assuming both LSA and vertex are router
LSAs b/c it is accessing the backlink and lsdesc as router lsdesc's also
making sure both are p2p links (which they would have to be to point at
each other).
The programming error here is that (A && B) == False does NOT imply !A,
but the code is written that way.
So we end up in the third block one of LSA or vertex being network LSAs
rather easily (whenever that is the case and the desc isn't the backlink
being sought).
This was caught by ASAN b/c the lsdesc and backlinks are being accessed
(> 4 byte field offsets) as if they were router lsdesc's in the third
block, when in fact one of them is a network lsdesc which is only 4
bytes long -- so ASAN flags the access beyond bounds.
Donald Sharp [Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:00:12 +0000 (16:00 -0400)]
lib: Allow ZAPI_MESSAGE_OPAQUE_LENGTH length of data
We are sending up to ZAPI_MESSAGE_OPAQUE_LENGTH but checking
for one less. We know the data will fit in it to that size.
Also we have asserts on the write to ensure we don't go over
it
Fixes: #8995 Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
David Lamparter [Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:57:36 +0000 (14:57 +0200)]
lib: fix coverity unused result warning
There's nothing that can be done here with an error. Try to make
Coverity understand that this is intentional.
(I don't know if the `(void)` will actually fix the coverity warning,
but I don't really have a better way to figure it out beyond just
getting this merged and waiting for a result...)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
ospf6d: Fix crash in ospf6_asbr_lsa_remove at ospf6d/ospf6_asbr.c:696
Issue: Crash observed when LSAs are removed from LSDB after max age
when there is no area configured.
(gdb) bt
0 raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
1 0x00007fdb190548bc in core_handler (signo=6, siginfo=0x7ffdd2f5a470, context=<optimized out>) at lib/sigevent.c:262
2 <signal handler called>
3 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
4 0x00007fdb185ad921 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
5 0x00007fdb1907f199 in _zlog_assert_failed (xref=xref@entry=0x55f30902aa20 <_xref.21999>, extra=extra@entry=0x0) at lib/zlog.c:581
6 0x000055f308dc4f78 in ospf6_asbr_lsa_remove (lsa=0x55f30a7546d0, asbr_entry=0x0) at ospf6d/ospf6_asbr.c:696
7 0x000055f308dd8f0d in ospf6_lsdb_remove (lsa=0x55f30a7546d0, lsdb=lsdb@entry=0x55f30a73d300) at ospf6d/ospf6_lsdb.c:166
8 0x000055f308dd9701 in ospf6_lsdb_maxage_remover (lsdb=0x55f30a73d300) at ospf6d/ospf6_lsdb.c:376
9 0x000055f308dee724 in ospf6_maxage_remover (thread=<optimized out>) at ospf6d/ospf6_top.c:603
10 0x00007fdb1906520d in thread_call (thread=thread@entry=0x7ffdd2f5ae90) at lib/thread.c:1919
11 0x00007fdb19023e48 in frr_run (master=0x55f30a569b70) at lib/libfrr.c:1155
12 0x000055f308dc09b6 in main (argc=6, argv=0x7ffdd2f5b198, envp=<optimized out>) at ospf6d/ospf6_main.c:235
(gdb)
Steps to reproduce the issue:
1. router ospf6
2. redistribute static
3. ipv6 route 1::1/128 Null0
4. no redistribute static
5. wait for Max aged LSA to flush
6. Check DB, crash occurs.
RCA:
Crash occurred while accessing listgetdata(listhead(ospf6->area_list))
When there is no area attached to any of the interface listhead(ospf6->area_list)
is NULL. Therefore it crashed due to NULL access.
Ondřej Surý [Mon, 15 Feb 2021 07:43:26 +0000 (08:43 +0100)]
doc: Use dpkg-buildpackage to build packages (add note about debuild)
The debuild command fails when we are doing source package only build
because it expects the arch-dependent .changes file to be present. Thus
in the instructions we switch to using dpkg-buildpackage directly and
add a note about using debuild in more complicated scenarios.
Ondřej Surý [Mon, 15 Feb 2021 07:40:08 +0000 (08:40 +0100)]
doc: Add instructions on how to build only source packages
In the CI, it's better to build the source package only once and then
instead of checking out the whole repository, only distribute the source
packages to the individual jobs.
Philippe Guibert [Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:07:52 +0000 (14:07 +0200)]
bgpd: nht unresolved with global address next-hop
When bgp peers with ipv6 link local addresses, it may receive a
BGP update with next-hop containing both LL and GA information.
By default, nexthop tracking applies to GA, and ignores presence
of LL, when both addresses are present. This is a problem for
resolving GA as next-hop as the next-hop information can be solved
by using the LL address only.
The solution consists in defaulting the nexthop ipv6 choice to LL
when available, and moving back to GA if a route-map is locally
configured at inbound.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Louis Scalbert [Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:30:05 +0000 (11:30 +0200)]
ospf6d: reset areas and redistribution at router-id modification
The ospf6 router-id is provided by order of preference by:
ospf6d itself if the "ospf6 router-id X.X.X.X" command is set.
- zebra. If the "ip router-id X.X.X.X" zebra command is set, the
configured IP is provided as the ID or alternatively the highest
loopback IPv4 address or else the highest interface IPv4 address.
The running ospf6 router-id is stored in ospf6->router-id.
ospf6->router-id can change in the following conditions:
- A configuration change provides a new router-id value according to
the above rules. ospf6->router-id is updated to the new value if
there is no adjacency in FULL state. Otherwise, the ospf6d process
must be restarted to take the new router-id into account.
- On startup of both zebra and ospf6d, if ospf6d has not yet received a
valid router-id, ospf6d->router-id is set to 0 (i.e. 0.0.0.0). Then,
zebra notifies ospf6d that the router-id is available.
At ospf6->router-id, the current behavior of ospf6d is the following:
- The self generated LSAs that refer to the previous router-id as the
advertising router are kept.
- Self generated LSAs are created with router-id value.
- LSAs from the redistribution that refer to the previous router-id are
kept and no new redistribution LSAs are created.
As a consequence, the routers in the ospf6 areas will get incorrect
LSAs and might not be able to install prefixes of those LSAs into their
RIB.
This fix solves this issue by resetting the areas and the redistribution
when ospf6->router-id updated.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Christian Hopps [Tue, 29 Jun 2021 22:03:31 +0000 (22:03 +0000)]
tests: collect support bundle data in parallel, fix bugs
Speedup (large topo): OLD: ~6 minutes NEW: ~1 second.
(when paired with common_config.py changes)
- Collect each "proc" support in parallel
- For each "proc" only call vtysh once with all commands
Bug fixes:
- output was broken, a dump of python "repr" format of str.
Donald Sharp [Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:25:43 +0000 (10:25 -0400)]
bgpd: Ensure v6 LL address is available before establishing peering
There are startup situations where we will attempt to connect to a remote
peer before bgp has received the v6 LL address. If we do not have this address
we must not allow the connection to come up until we have one available to use
in those situations where we must have a v6 LL address.
ospf6d: route-map config changed, not getting applied on all types of routes
Problem Statement:
==================
when route-map config is changed from permit to deny, it is not getting
applied to both connected and static and vice versa
RCA:
==================
When route-map changes from permit to deny or vice versa, a notification is
sent to ospf6 daemon via ospf6_asbr_routemap_update. In this function, a thread
is scheduled after 5 seconds to apply the route-map changes. In this thread
(ospf6_asbr_routemap_update_timer), only the first type is passed as argument
and only the first type i.e "connected" is passed and hence in callback only
on this type of route route-map gets applied.
Fix:
====
Need to loop through all the route-types in the call back and process
the route-map changes. Added a flag to mark which all route-types needs
to be processed.
Test Executed:
===============
1. Change route-map from permit to deny.
2. Change route-map from deny to permit.
3. Add new route and checked.
4. Verified summarised routes.
projects / matthieu / frr.git / log