create_route_maps,
verify_prefix_lists,
topo_daemons,
+ shutdown_bringup_interface
)
from lib.topolog import logger
from lib.topojson import build_topo_from_json, build_config_from_json
write_test_footer(tc_name)
+def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc25_p0(request):
+ """
+ OSPF route map support functionality.
+
+ Verify OSPF route map support functionality
+ when route map actions are toggled.
+
+ """
+ tc_name = request.node.name
+ write_test_header(tc_name)
+ tgen = get_topogen()
+ global topo
+ step("Bring up the base config as per the topology")
+
+ reset_config_on_routers(tgen)
+
+ step(
+ "Create static routes(10.0.20.1/32) in R1 and redistribute "
+ "to OSPF using route map.")
+
+ # Create Static routes
+ input_dict = {
+ "r0": {
+ "static_routes": [
+ {
+ "network": NETWORK['ipv4'][0],
+ "no_of_ip": 5,
+ "next_hop": 'Null0',
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_static_routes(tgen, input_dict)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ ospf_red_r0 = {
+ "r0": {
+ "ospf": {
+ "redistribute": [{
+ "redist_type": "static",
+ "route_map": "rmap_ipv4"
+ }]
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_router_ospf(tgen, topo, ospf_red_r0)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+ step("Configure route map with permit rule")
+ # Create route map
+ routemaps = {
+ "r0": {
+ "route_maps": {
+ "rmap_ipv4": [{
+ "action": "permit"
+ }]
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_route_maps(tgen, routemaps)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ step("Verify that route is advertised to R1.")
+ dut = 'r1'
+ protocol = 'ospf'
+ result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+ step("Configure route map with deny rule")
+ # Create route map
+ routemaps = {
+ "r0": {
+ "route_maps": {
+ "rmap_ipv4": [{
+ "seq_id": 10,
+ "action": "deny"
+ }]
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_route_maps(tgen, routemaps)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ # Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
+ ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
+ assert ospf_covergence is True, ("setup_module :Failed \n Error:"
+ " {}".format(ospf_covergence))
+
+ step("Verify that route is not advertised to R1.")
+ dut = 'r1'
+ protocol = 'ospf'
+ result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
+ assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol,
+ expected=False)
+ assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ write_test_footer(tc_name)
+
+
+def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc22_p0(request):
+ """
+ OSPF Route map - Multiple sequence numbers.
+
+ Verify OSPF route map support functionality with multiple sequence
+ numbers in a single route-map for different match/set clauses.
+
+ """
+ tc_name = request.node.name
+ write_test_header(tc_name)
+ tgen = get_topogen()
+ global topo
+ step("Bring up the base config as per the topology")
+
+ reset_config_on_routers(tgen)
+
+ step(
+ "Configure route map with seq number 10 to with ip prefix"
+ " permitting route 10.0.20.1/32 in R1")
+ step(
+ "Configure route map with seq number 20 to with ip prefix"
+ " permitting route 10.0.20.2/32 in R1")
+
+ # Create route map
+ input_dict_3 = {
+ "r0": {
+ "route_maps": {
+ "rmap_ipv4": [{
+ "action": "permit",
+ 'seq_id': '10',
+ "match": {
+ "ipv4": {
+ "prefix_lists": "pf_list_1_ipv4"
+ }
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "action": "permit",
+ 'seq_id': '20',
+ "match": {
+ "ipv4": {
+ "prefix_lists": "pf_list_2_ipv4"
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_route_maps(tgen, input_dict_3)
+ assert result is True, 'Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}'.format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ # Create ip prefix list
+ input_dict_2 = {
+ 'r0': {
+ 'prefix_lists': {
+ 'ipv4': {
+ 'pf_list_1_ipv4': [{
+ 'seqid': 10,
+ 'network': NETWORK['ipv4'][0],
+ 'action': 'permit'
+ }]
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_prefix_lists(tgen, input_dict_2)
+ assert result is True, 'Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}'.format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ # Create ip prefix list
+ input_dict_2 = {
+ 'r0': {
+ 'prefix_lists': {
+ 'ipv4': {
+ 'pf_list_2_ipv4': [{
+ 'seqid': 10,
+ 'network': NETWORK['ipv4'][1],
+ 'action': 'permit'
+ }]
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_prefix_lists(tgen, input_dict_2)
+ assert result is True, 'Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}'.format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ step("Configure static routes 10.0.20.1/32 and 10.0.20.2 in R1")
+ # Create Static routes
+ input_dict = {
+ "r0": {
+ "static_routes": [
+ {
+ "network": NETWORK['ipv4'][0],
+ "no_of_ip": 5,
+ "next_hop": 'Null0',
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_static_routes(tgen, input_dict)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ step("Configure redistribute static route with route map.")
+ ospf_red_r0 = {
+ "r0": {
+ "ospf": {
+ "redistribute": [{
+ "redist_type": "static",
+ "route_map": "rmap_ipv4"
+ }]
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_router_ospf(tgen, topo, ospf_red_r0)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ input_dict = {
+ "r0": {
+ "static_routes": [
+ {
+ "network": NETWORK['ipv4'][0],
+ "no_of_ip": 2,
+ "next_hop": 'Null0',
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_static_routes(tgen, input_dict)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ step("Verify that both routes are learned in R1 and R2")
+ dut = 'r1'
+ protocol = 'ospf'
+ result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ dut = 'r2'
+ protocol = 'ospf'
+ result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol)
+ assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ step("Change route map with seq number 20 to deny.")
+ # Create route map
+ input_dict_3 = {
+ "r0": {
+ "route_maps": {
+ "rmap_ipv4": [
+ {
+ "action": "deny",
+ 'seq_id': '20',
+ "match": {
+ "ipv4": {
+ "prefix_lists": "pf_list_2_ipv4"
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ result = create_route_maps(tgen, input_dict_3)
+ assert result is True, 'Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}'.format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ step(
+ "Verify the route 10.0.20.2/32 is withdrawn and not present "
+ "in the routing table of R0 and R1.")
+
+ input_dict = {
+ "r0": {
+ "static_routes": [
+ {
+ "network": NETWORK['ipv4'][1],
+ "next_hop": 'Null0'
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+
+ dut = 'r1'
+ protocol = 'ospf'
+ result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
+ assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol,
+ expected=False)
+ assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ dut = 'r2'
+ protocol = 'ospf'
+ result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
+ assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol,
+ expected=False)
+ assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+ tc_name, result)
+
+ write_test_footer(tc_name)
+
+
if __name__ == "__main__":
args = ["-s"] + sys.argv[1:]
sys.exit(pytest.main(args))