The bgp_l3vpn_to_direct test is failing sometimes because
the 2.2.2.2 route is dissapearing. What is happening?
The log file for the failed test run shows us this:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 scripts/adjacencies.py:8 WAIT:r4:ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1: 0. packet loss:wait:PE->P2 (loopback) ping:60:0.5:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 Fri Oct 15 14:26:12 2021 (#9) scripts/adjacencies.py:8 COMMAND:r4:ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1: 0. packet loss:wait:PE->P2 (loopback) ping:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 COMMAND OUTPUT:PING 2.2.2.2 (2.2.2.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 64 bytes from 2.2.2.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.143 ms
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 --- 2.2.2.2 ping statistics ---
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.143/0.143/0.143/0.000 ms:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 Done after 1 loops, time=0.
024507761001586914, Found= 0% packet loss
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 Fri Oct 15 14:26:12 2021 (#9) scripts/adjacencies.py:9 COMMAND:r4:ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1: 0. packet loss:pass:PE->P2 (loopback) ping +0.02 secs:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 2021-10-15 14:26:12,446 WARNING: topolog.r4: LinuxNamespace(r4): proc failed: rc 2 pid 28826
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 args: /usr/bin/nsenter -a -t 27444 -F --wd=/tmp/topotests/bgp_l3vpn_to_bgp_direct.test_bgp_l3vpn_to_bgp_direct/r4 /bin/bash -c ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 stdout: connect: Network is unreachable:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:17 COMMAND OUTPUT:connect: Network is unreachable:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:17 R:9 r4 PE->P2 (loopback) ping +0.02 secs 0 1
So the 2.2.2.2 route is coming/going and is failing on these test lines:
luCommand(
"r1", "ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1", " 0. packet loss", "wait", "PE->P2 (loopback) ping", 60
)
luCommand(
"r3", "ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1", " 0. packet loss", "wait", "PE->P2 (loopback) ping", 60
)
luCommand(
"r4", "ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1", " 0. packet loss", "wait", "PE->P2 (loopback) ping", 60
)
So the 2.2.2.2 routes on r1,3 and 4 are received via ospf, but are
modified by some other process to add labels ( probably ldp, since
it is running too ). The 2nd ping to 2.2.2.2 is failing because
the 2.2.2.2 route on r4 is being replaced. As an example here
is `ip monitor all` on r4 during boot up. Please note timestamps
are not necessarily representative of what we will see on the
loaded ci system.
[2021-10-15T15:46:52.261456] [NEXTHOP]id 27 via 10.0.2.2 dev r4-eth0 scope link proto zebra
[2021-10-15T15:46:52.261490] [ROUTE]2.2.2.2 nhid 27 via 10.0.2.2 dev r4-eth0 proto ospf metric 20
<snip>
[2021-10-15T15:46:53.556405] [NEXTHOP]Deleted id 27 via 10.0.2.2 dev r4-eth0 scope link proto zebra
<snip>
[2021-10-15T15:46:53.566575] [NEXTHOP]id 32 via 10.0.2.2 dev r4-eth0 scope link proto zebra
[2021-10-15T15:46:53.566585] [ROUTE]2.2.2.2 nhid 32 via 10.0.2.2 dev r4-eth0 proto ospf metric 20
For a small amount of time the route was *gone*. I believe the upstream
CI system hits that window sometimes, causing the test to fail.
This patch attempts to ensure that the 2.2.2.2 route should be learned
appropriately ( thus slowing it down ) before the test moves onto
the ping. I suspect the long term answer might be to add a test to
the scripts/adjancies.py script to ensure that the test does not
continue until the appropriate label is in place, but I want to
make the test run a bit more perscriptive in what it is looking
for here.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
luCommand("ce1", 'vtysh -c "show bgp summary"', " 00:0", "wait", "Adjacencies up", 180)
luCommand("ce2", 'vtysh -c "show bgp summary"', " 00:0", "wait", "Adjacencies up", 180)
luCommand("ce3", 'vtysh -c "show bgp summary"', " 00:0", "wait", "Adjacencies up", 180)
+luCommand(
+ "r1", 'vtysh -c "show ip route ospf"', "2.2.2.2", "wait", "OSPF Route has Arrived", 60)
luCommand(
"r1", "ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1", " 0. packet loss", "wait", "PE->P2 (loopback) ping", 60
)
+luCommand(
+ "r3", 'vtysh -c "show ip route ospf"', "2.2.2.2", "wait", "OSPF Route has Arrived", 60)
luCommand(
"r3", "ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1", " 0. packet loss", "wait", "PE->P2 (loopback) ping", 60
)
+
+luCommand(
+ "r4", 'vtysh -c "show ip route ospf"', "2.2.2.2", "wait", "OSPF Route has Arrived", 60)
luCommand(
"r4", "ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1", " 0. packet loss", "wait", "PE->P2 (loopback) ping", 60
)