We shoult not call bgp_unlock() before calling
bgp_delete_connected_nexthop() in the peer_free() function. Otherwise,
if bgp->lock reaches zero, bgp_free() is called and peer->bgp becomes
an invalid pointer in the bgp_delete_connected_nexthop() function.
To fix this, move the call to bgp_unlock() to the end of peer_free().
Bug exposed by commit
37d361e ("bgpd: plug several memleaks").
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
{
assert (peer->status == Deleted);
- bgp_unlock(peer->bgp);
-
/* this /ought/ to have been done already through bgp_stop earlier,
* but just to be sure..
*/
bfd_info_free(&(peer->bfd_info));
+ bgp_unlock(peer->bgp);
+
memset (peer, 0, sizeof (struct peer));
XFREE (MTYPE_BGP_PEER, peer);