==25402==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x533302 in calloc (/usr/lib/frr/zebra+0x533302)
#1 0x7fee84cdc80b in qcalloc /home/qlyoung/frr/lib/memory.c:110:27
#2 0x5a3032 in create_label_chunk /home/qlyoung/frr/zebra/label_manager.c:188:3
#3 0x5a3c2b in assign_label_chunk /home/qlyoung/frr/zebra/label_manager.c:354:8
#4 0x5a2a38 in label_manager_get_chunk /home/qlyoung/frr/zebra/label_manager.c:424:9
#5 0x5a1412 in hook_call_lm_get_chunk /home/qlyoung/frr/zebra/label_manager.c:60:1
#6 0x5a1412 in lm_get_chunk_call /home/qlyoung/frr/zebra/label_manager.c:81:2
#7 0x72a234 in zread_get_label_chunk /home/qlyoung/frr/zebra/zapi_msg.c:2026:2
#8 0x72a234 in zread_label_manager_request /home/qlyoung/frr/zebra/zapi_msg.c:2073:4
#9 0x73150c in zserv_handle_commands /home/qlyoung/frr/zebra/zapi_msg.c:2688:2
When creating label chunk that has a specified base, we eventually are
calling assign_specific_label_chunk. This function finds the appropriate
list node and deletes it from the lbl_mgr.lc_list but since
the function uses list_delete_node() the deletion function that is
specified for lbl_mgr.lc_list is not called thus dropping the memory.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
* included in the previous one */
for (node = first_node; node && (node != last_node);
node = next) {
+ struct label_manager_chunk *death;
+
next = listnextnode(node);
+ death = listgetdata(node);
list_delete_node(lbl_mgr.lc_list, node);
+ delete_label_chunk(death);
}
lmc = create_label_chunk(proto, instance, keep, base, end);